‘No to Pinkham Way’ Petition
LATEST: 29th October 2011
TIME IS RUNNING OUT TO HAVE YOUR SAY ON PINKHAM WAY!
I am writing to update you on the plan to develop a waste management facility at Pinkham Way. In Enfield I have been leading the opposition to the plan which if implemented would have a detrimental impact on our local environment. As we look forward to improvements over the next year in the A406, redevelopment of properties and regeneration of New Southgate, a massive waste management facility would be in the wrong place at the wrong time. North London Waste Authority (NLWA) had wanted the plan to go through quietly with little consultation with my constituents. Combining with local Conservative Councillors, the Pinkham Way Alliance and residents associations we did not let them get away with it. I held public meetings, delivered leaflets and knocked on doors across our affected area in Palmers Green, Bowes and Southgate Green. I called on Enfield Council to formally oppose the NLWA's plan. I was disappointed that the Council ducked the opportunity to kick out the plan although not surprised given the Council leader wrote to me to say that the Council could not reject its "own plan". However our campaign has been successful. Haringey Council announced that the NLWA outline planning application was “on hold”, and it emerged that the Government’s Planning Inspectorate had criticised Haringey Council on the consultation process used for their overall plan for the Borough - called the Core Strategy. Specifically, Haringey had sought to change the land designation at Pinkham Way from ‘employment’ to ‘industrial’ use. No doubt the Council thought that they needed to make the change to smooth the path for the NLWA’s proposed new waste plant. Haringey were accused of running a consultation that “could appear to be prejudicial to the interests of fairness and natural justice”. So we now have the opportunity to be part of the consultation. But time is running out and ends at 5pm on Thursday November 3rd. The response to this consultation should be limited to the question of the designation of the Pinkham Way site, the danger to the site's nature conservation status caused by any planned development, and the soundness or otherwise of Haringey's evidence for it. At this stage comments about traffic and congestion, pollution and air quality, proximity to homes and schools, or problems about recycling and waste management are not relevant. Whten new planning applications are made next year we can make these points. I am making the following points which you also may wish to adopt: I object to a designation of the former Friern Barnet Sewage treatment site as a Locally Significant Industrial Use. The loss of any protection for the nature conservation value of the site would be detrimental to the natural and local environment. I formally request an assessment of the eco systems and natural habitats on the site to determine its nature conservation value. The Government have now provided the tools for conducting such an assessment which should form the basis of any proposed re-designation. It should be noted that the loss of the caveat to protect the nature conservation is a major change to the protection this site. A consequence would be the likely loss of this valuable nature conservation site, which is one of only nine sites designated Grade 1 of Borough Importance for Nature Conservation. It will widen the range of uses on the site to include heavy industrial type uses, with all the potential noise, pollution and traffic congestion impacting upon the local environment. Inevitably re-designation would mean the site would become vulnerable to Policy 4.4 of the London Plan, which directs local authorities in London to identify Locally Significant Industrial Sites which might be suitable for waste management. The significant local opposition to such a use should be noted. It is not based on robust or credible evidence. No credible evidence was produced at the Examination in Public, and the re-consultation document CSSD-3 has no new evidence. The updated Sustainability Appraisal which has been produced by Hyder Consulting UK Limited to provide further evidence in support of this re-consultation does not contain any new evidence to support this re-designation; on the contrary, it points out the threat to the biodiversity of the site. In the Core Strategy pre-submission draft, the site was designated Employment Land, with supporting evidence for this designation. It would seem that pre-planning application discussions with North London Waste Authority and Barnet Council in relation to the development of a waste processing plant and Barnet Council’s proposal to relocate its refuse vehicle depot have influenced the proposal to re-designate use. This gives continued grounds for again concluding that the consultation would "appear to be prejudicial to the interests of fairness and natural justice”. There is no evidence that Haringey considered whether alternative designations would be appropriate - e.g. Metropolitan Open Land, Local Green Space designation or Green Grid cross-boundary green space, connecting Barnet, Haringey and Enfield National policy has recognised that networks of natural habitats provide a valuable resource and this should be reflected in the Core Strategy, and specifically in the designation of the site. It is not deliverable: The LSIS designation is only deliverable if the Grade 1 Borough Importance for Nature designation is removed or substantially compromised. The Council’s own additional evidence points out, in relation to the Friern Barnet site in particular, that any development on the site has potential to have biodiversity impacts, because it is a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation. Finally, the Government has just concluded its consultation with regard to National Planning Policy Guidance (NPPG). It would be premature to re-designate in advance of consideration of the NPPG which should then lead to consultation on the Core Strategy. Please email email@example.com or write to LDF Team, London Borough of Haringey, River Bank House (6th floor), Wood Green, London, N22 8HQ to submit your objections by 5pm on Thursday 3rd November and pass this on to any neighbours or friends who may not be aware of the consultation.
With best wishes
David Burrowes MP
Member of Parliament for Enfield Southgate
The current work on improvements to the A406 and New Southgate area will mean that some of the most neglected parts of my constituency can look forward to being the most regenerated. However the plans to build Britain's biggest waste management site at Pinkham Way threatens this optimistic outlook.
The prospect of hundreds of waste trucks on the doorstep of this area is of great concern. The scale of the Pinkham Way waste facility will take us in the wrong direction at the wrong time. We have fought too long and too hard for the improvements to the North Circular Road and New Southgate only to see the area dumped upon.
Please sign to support my Enfield campaign to say 'No to Pinkham Way'.